University of Tehran Law Quarterly 2588-5618 39 3 2009 09 23 BASES OF EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE IN TRANSNATIONAL AND IRANIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW BASES OF EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE IN TRANSNATIONAL AND IRANIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW 20108 FA Ali Reza Azarbaijani Journal Article 1970 01 01 We have seen many changes in the area of evidentiary rules in developed countries whose aim is not only settlement of disputes but also achievement of justice and having real judges through expanding their powers and discretions. The main way to gain this goal is evaluation of evidence by prosecutors. Evaluation of evidence means to judge about the value and merits of any evidence. This, accordance to relevant facts of any cases would differ from one case to another. In the other word, while we evaluate the evidences, once strictly & theoretically, then accordance to conditions and facts of cases, the respective results would be much different. Evaluation of evidence in the most cases is supposed to be as a way to achievement of real facts. We have seen many changes in the area of evidentiary rules in developed countries whose aim is not only settlement of disputes but also achievement of justice and having real judges through expanding their powers and discretions. The main way to gain this goal is evaluation of evidence by prosecutors. Evaluation of evidence means to judge about the value and merits of any evidence. This, accordance to relevant facts of any cases would differ from one case to another. In the other word, while we evaluate the evidences, once strictly & theoretically, then accordance to conditions and facts of cases, the respective results would be much different. Evaluation of evidence in the most cases is supposed to be as a way to achievement of real facts. https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_20108_443a38ba049d6347632afbd0ed10a75d.pdf