University of Tehran Law Quarterly 2588-5618 39 3 2009 09 23 SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE AND BACKGROUND EVIDENCE IN IRAN AND ENGLISH CRIMINAL LAW SIMILAR FACT EVIDENCE AND BACKGROUND EVIDENCE IN IRAN AND ENGLISH CRIMINAL LAW 20121 FA Alireza Gharajehloo Journal Article 1970 01 01 Proof in criminal cases is conducted by two factor including evidence and presumptions. The former concept is divided to presumption of fact and presumption of law. Presumption of law is the cases that judge by the circumstances inference. In this paper we want to explain some examples of presumption of fact that are similar fact evidence and background evidence. Proof in criminal cases is conducted by two factor including evidence and presumptions. The former concept is divided to presumption of fact and presumption of law. Presumption of law is the cases that judge by the circumstances inference. In this paper we want to explain some examples of presumption of fact that are similar fact evidence and background evidence. Proof in criminal cases is conducted by two factor including evidence and presumptions. The former concept is divided to presumption of fact and presumption of law. Presumption of law is the cases that judge by the circumstances inference. In this paper we want to explain some examples of presumption of fact that are similar fact evidence and background evidence. Proof in criminal cases is conducted by two factor including evidence and presumptions. The former concept is divided to presumption of fact and presumption of law. Presumption of law is the cases that judge by the circumstances inference. In this paper we want to explain some examples of presumption of fact that are similar fact evidence and background evidence. https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_20121_7358e6510d7c8648b2246d62926c092f.pdf