<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>39</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>MORALITY OF THE DUTY OF OBEDIENCE TO LAW</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>MORALITY OF THE DUTY OF OBEDIENCE TO LAW</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20123</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Shahram</FirstName>
					<LastName>Keyvanfar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&quot;&quot;Whether a duty of obedience to law is a moral duty as well&quot; is one of the crucial questions in the field of Philosophy of Law. In this regard three answers are supposed: 
1- Obedience to law is not a moral duty; 
2- Obedience to law is an absolute moral duty;
3- Obedience to law is a prima facie moral duty.
  Many of law philosophers (particularly some of the adherents to positivism e.g. Astin) attribute obedience to law to the fear of the sanctions and consider the law and ethics as pertaining to two separate fields.  They simply believe that a moral duty to obey a norm cannot be inferred form its legality, as a legal duty to obey a norm, is not inferred form its morality.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&quot;&quot;Whether a duty of obedience to law is a moral duty as well&quot; is one of the crucial questions in the field of Philosophy of Law. In this regard three answers are supposed: 
1- Obedience to law is not a moral duty; 
2- Obedience to law is an absolute moral duty;
3- Obedience to law is a prima facie moral duty.
  Many of law philosophers (particularly some of the adherents to positivism e.g. Astin) attribute obedience to law to the fear of the sanctions and consider the law and ethics as pertaining to two separate fields.  They simply believe that a moral duty to obey a norm cannot be inferred form its legality, as a legal duty to obey a norm, is not inferred form its morality.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Civil disobedience.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Moral duty</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">moral right</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Obedience to law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Political duty</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_20123_e980ddfad9e9cc5f913eabc0bce5f147.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
