<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>39</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>EXTRATERRITORIAL EFFECT OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>EXTRATERRITORIAL EFFECT OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20209</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadat-Akhavi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Horrieh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hosseini Akbarnezhad</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides that the Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone ‘within their jurisdiction’ the Rights and freedoms defined in the Convention.
At a technical level, the key question is how one should interpret the word ‘jurisdiction’ in Article 1. This Article plays a key role in the convention system since it sets out the limits on the obligations assumed by states under the Convention. The question that to what extent the European Convention  applies to extraterritorial acts of the States Parties is certainly not a new one. But it has received some more attention in the recent case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the case of Bankovic (2001) offering on occasion for the Strasbourg Court to address this matter in considerable detail.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides that the Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone ‘within their jurisdiction’ the Rights and freedoms defined in the Convention.
At a technical level, the key question is how one should interpret the word ‘jurisdiction’ in Article 1. This Article plays a key role in the convention system since it sets out the limits on the obligations assumed by states under the Convention. The question that to what extent the European Convention  applies to extraterritorial acts of the States Parties is certainly not a new one. But it has received some more attention in the recent case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the case of Bankovic (2001) offering on occasion for the Strasbourg Court to address this matter in considerable detail.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">European Convention on Human Rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">European Court of Human Rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Extraterritorial Jurisdiction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">human rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Human rights .</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_20209_597181f836218ec128636878effe540d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
