<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>39</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS WITH POSSIBILITY  OF ENFORCEMENT</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS WITH POSSIBILITY  OF ENFORCEMENT</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20212</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Amir</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadeghi Neshat</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Contracts, as is famous in Iranian law, could be terminated if only could not be enforced and performed by whether obligor, or with his charges and by obligee or third party.
   This view, while may lead to some trouble and injustice for both parties  or one of them in many cases, is baseless in Islamic law, as our legal foundation, and also inconsistent with French and Common Law and principles of international trade law. In addition, the above view could not be even logically supported by Iranian civil code’s provisions. 
   The author’s view is, however, opposite to above famous one and is supported by Islamic law, civil code, other legal systems and international trade law.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Contracts, as is famous in Iranian law, could be terminated if only could not be enforced and performed by whether obligor, or with his charges and by obligee or third party.
   This view, while may lead to some trouble and injustice for both parties  or one of them in many cases, is baseless in Islamic law, as our legal foundation, and also inconsistent with French and Common Law and principles of international trade law. In addition, the above view could not be even logically supported by Iranian civil code’s provisions. 
   The author’s view is, however, opposite to above famous one and is supported by Islamic law, civil code, other legal systems and international trade law.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Civil Code</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Contract</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">enforcement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">French  law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Law of international trade .</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">termination</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_20212_c33d9610b239ead87b41020c1ebcab55.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
