<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>40</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>THE CONCEPTS AND BASES OF EXTERNAL EFFECTS OR OPPOSABILITE OF CONTRACT</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>THE CONCEPTS AND BASES OF EXTERNAL EFFECTS OR OPPOSABILITE OF CONTRACT</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20858</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sayyed Mohammad Mahdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Qabuli Dorafshan</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>External effects or opposabilité is a legal subject that some legal authors of France take advantage of which for clarifying the scope of the doctrine of the privity of contract and as a complementary principal. The use of the foresaid term does not go back to a long way and there is still a dispute over its bases. Because the doctrine of the privity of contract is adapted from the Civil Code of France and entered into the Civil Code of Iran, the clarification of its concepts and bases not only will be helpful in clarifying the doctrine of the privity of contract but also shows the effects of contract on third parties. For this reason, in this essay I shall try to process the concept of External Effects or Opposabilité and analyze its bases in the Iranian and French law.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">External effects or opposabilité is a legal subject that some legal authors of France take advantage of which for clarifying the scope of the doctrine of the privity of contract and as a complementary principal. The use of the foresaid term does not go back to a long way and there is still a dispute over its bases. Because the doctrine of the privity of contract is adapted from the Civil Code of France and entered into the Civil Code of Iran, the clarification of its concepts and bases not only will be helpful in clarifying the doctrine of the privity of contract but also shows the effects of contract on third parties. For this reason, in this essay I shall try to process the concept of External Effects or Opposabilité and analyze its bases in the Iranian and French law.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Chose in action</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Chose in possession</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Contract</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">direct effect</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">External effects or opposabilité</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Indirect effect.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">parties</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Principal</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Privity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">third party</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_20858_ced033dacc1bac3b7a65b72f47d1f40a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
