<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>38</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2008</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>COMPETENT COURT FOR ANNULMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>COMPETENT COURT FOR ANNULMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARD IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">27078</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>One of the complicated debates in international commercial arbitration law is the matter of judicial competence for examination of challenge over arbitral awards and annulment proceedings. In the first part of this essay, I have tried to clarify that judicial competence on annulment proceedings is limited to national or domestic arbitral awards and then, to give main criteria for determination of nationality of arbitral awards based on their popularity and acceptance in the world. Incompatibility among the said criteria, specially the two main criteria i.e. criterion of place of issuance of the award and criterion of law of procedure, have caused undesirable effects like positive and negative  conflict of jurisdictions over challenge proceedings. This problem and relative solutions for decreasing the indicated effects are studied in the second part of the essay.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">One of the complicated debates in international commercial arbitration law is the matter of judicial competence for examination of challenge over arbitral awards and annulment proceedings. In the first part of this essay, I have tried to clarify that judicial competence on annulment proceedings is limited to national or domestic arbitral awards and then, to give main criteria for determination of nationality of arbitral awards based on their popularity and acceptance in the world. Incompatibility among the said criteria, specially the two main criteria i.e. criterion of place of issuance of the award and criterion of law of procedure, have caused undesirable effects like positive and negative  conflict of jurisdictions over challenge proceedings. This problem and relative solutions for decreasing the indicated effects are studied in the second part of the essay.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Annulment of  Arbitral Award.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Challenge of Arbitral Award</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Domestic Arbitral Award</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Foreign Arbitral Award</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Geographical Criterion/ Place of Issuance of Arbitral Award</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Jurisdiction/ Judicial Competence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Nationality of Arbitral Award</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Procedural Criterion</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_27078_dbb80a3d32340917a1dc8d7d43b2a8d1.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
