<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>38</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2008</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>NEW VIEW TO RES JUDICATS IN CRIMINAL LAW</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>NEW VIEW TO RES JUDICATS IN CRIMINAL LAW</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">27315</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The decision of Court and Public Prosecution in criminal matter has a absolute Res Judicats. The main conditions of Res Judicats (cause, object and person unity) become mooted in criminal law again, but criminal law is differ from civil law in this matter. In civil law, Res Judicats consider according to general conditions but criminal law can not consider upon those conditions. Many cases, specifically in ralations between abettors and accomplices, plurality of crimes and its descriptions necessitate another consideration that differ from civil law and its relativity.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The decision of Court and Public Prosecution in criminal matter has a absolute Res Judicats. The main conditions of Res Judicats (cause, object and person unity) become mooted in criminal law again, but criminal law is differ from civil law in this matter. In civil law, Res Judicats consider according to general conditions but criminal law can not consider upon those conditions. Many cases, specifically in ralations between abettors and accomplices, plurality of crimes and its descriptions necessitate another consideration that differ from civil law and its relativity.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cause</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Civil law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Conflict of judgments</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Criminal Law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Description</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Double prosecution</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Estopple rule</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">object</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Res Judicats</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_27315_e5539cbd71d9f0890caba5141dbdd09a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
