<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>38</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2008</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>ENFORCEMENT OF NULLIFIED ARBITRAL AWARDS</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>ENFORCEMENT OF NULLIFIED ARBITRAL AWARDS</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">27613</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>One of the most controversial issues in international commercial arbitrations in the last two decades is enforcement of arbitral awards which have been annulled in their country/ies of issuance or in broader word in their country/ies of origin. Two contradictory opinions on the matter are based on two different approaches on territorial or extraterritorial effect of nullification of arbitral award by competent court. Considering the French court’s recent judgment on enforcement of arbitral award rendered in PT Putrabali Adyamulia v. Dena Holding case, despite its annulment in the country where it was made i.e. United Kingdom, author is interested in studying the theoretical and practical aspects of enforcement of nullified arbitral award in this article.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">One of the most controversial issues in international commercial arbitrations in the last two decades is enforcement of arbitral awards which have been annulled in their country/ies of issuance or in broader word in their country/ies of origin. Two contradictory opinions on the matter are based on two different approaches on territorial or extraterritorial effect of nullification of arbitral award by competent court. Considering the French court’s recent judgment on enforcement of arbitral award rendered in PT Putrabali Adyamulia v. Dena Holding case, despite its annulment in the country where it was made i.e. United Kingdom, author is interested in studying the theoretical and practical aspects of enforcement of nullified arbitral award in this article.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Country of origin</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Enforcement.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Extraterritorial effect</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Nullification/Annulment</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Nullified/Annulled arbitral award</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Territorial effect</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_27613_984c1a53ee9a7f24b465e61301475f5f.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
