<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>40</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>SUSPENSION OF PERFORMANCE DUE TO ANTICIPATORY BREACH UNDER THE UN CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS (1980)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>SUSPENSION OF PERFORMANCE DUE TO ANTICIPATORY BREACH UNDER THE UN CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS (1980)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>17</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>36</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">29505</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Davood</FirstName>
					<LastName>Andarz</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>One of the most important questions in international sale of goods  contracts is withholding performance or suspension of performance due to anticipatpry breach.When it becomes clear that one of the parties will not be able to perform his obligation  according to the contract in the future, naturally and logically, the other party is entitled to suspend his performance. But the main question which remains is that when and how a party is legally entitled to suspend his performance.In oder to answer this question, in this article I have discussed  the grounds of suspension, stoppage in transit, providing assurance and the effect of failure to give notice of suspension. The base of study is UN convention on contracts for the international sale of goods (CISG).</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">One of the most important questions in international sale of goods  contracts is withholding performance or suspension of performance due to anticipatpry breach.When it becomes clear that one of the parties will not be able to perform his obligation  according to the contract in the future, naturally and logically, the other party is entitled to suspend his performance. But the main question which remains is that when and how a party is legally entitled to suspend his performance.In oder to answer this question, in this article I have discussed  the grounds of suspension, stoppage in transit, providing assurance and the effect of failure to give notice of suspension. The base of study is UN convention on contracts for the international sale of goods (CISG).</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Anticipatory Breach</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Notice of suspension.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Providing adequate assurance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Right of suspension</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Stoppage in transit</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Withholding performance</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_29505_3d2d94de4169488a1022ca03d72895c3.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
