<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>40</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>JUST CHARACTER OF MINIMUM SENSUAL OF WITNESSES</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>JUST CHARACTER OF MINIMUM SENSUAL OF WITNESSES</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>79</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>98</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">29544</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali Akbar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Izadifard</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hossein</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kaviar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Some of the imperative qualifications about witness, are for amount of apprehension and sense of witness; e.g. be maturity and sensible, and some of them are for confidence to witness e.g. be just. Holding the condition of justice of witness has be unanimity of votes by the jurists. But this matter, is just the good conduct or avoidance the faults or avoidance them from firm state or affective firm state that abet the person to piety and humanity, is dissidence between the jurists. In summation of said point of views, may be said just character of minimum sensual of witnesses. Proving it isn’t difficult. Continuity of piety and temperance and norm conduct in society is idealistic state that called just firm state. Criterion of it is customary state of witness.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Some of the imperative qualifications about witness, are for amount of apprehension and sense of witness; e.g. be maturity and sensible, and some of them are for confidence to witness e.g. be just. Holding the condition of justice of witness has be unanimity of votes by the jurists. But this matter, is just the good conduct or avoidance the faults or avoidance them from firm state or affective firm state that abet the person to piety and humanity, is dissidence between the jurists. In summation of said point of views, may be said just character of minimum sensual of witnesses. Proving it isn’t difficult. Continuity of piety and temperance and norm conduct in society is idealistic state that called just firm state. Criterion of it is customary state of witness.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Affective just</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Customary state.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Just character of minimum sensual</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Testimony</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Verbal just</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Witness</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_29544_979082da4a9b3d63351b783bd98a6e9d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
