<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>42</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>IMPRISONING A HUSBAND WHO REFUSES TO PAY ALIMONY TO HIS WIFE</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>IMPRISONING A HUSBAND WHO REFUSES TO PAY ALIMONY TO HIS WIFE</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>53</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>66</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">29816</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jlq.2012.29816</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyed Mohammadreza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ayati</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>St. Abdoljabbar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zargushnasab</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this paper there has paid to ideas and evidences of Jurisprudents about imprisoning a husband who refuses to pay alimony to his wife. 
The verdict of those Sunni Jurisprudents that&quot; if the husband is hard up he is only convicted to a discretionary imprisonment &quot;is not correct because the verdict is both contradictory with the Verse of hard up &quot;if a man is poor and hard up give him a respite until he becomes a rich man&quot; (Surah the Cow, Verse 280) and it has paradox with some Narrations There are differences of opinions between scholars and Jurisprudents of both Shiites and Sunni on the proposed issue. All of ideas are classified into three Shiites groups and four Sunni groups and every one of them has analyzed thoroughly.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In this paper there has paid to ideas and evidences of Jurisprudents about imprisoning a husband who refuses to pay alimony to his wife. 
The verdict of those Sunni Jurisprudents that&quot; if the husband is hard up he is only convicted to a discretionary imprisonment &quot;is not correct because the verdict is both contradictory with the Verse of hard up &quot;if a man is poor and hard up give him a respite until he becomes a rich man&quot; (Surah the Cow, Verse 280) and it has paradox with some Narrations There are differences of opinions between scholars and Jurisprudents of both Shiites and Sunni on the proposed issue. All of ideas are classified into three Shiites groups and four Sunni groups and every one of them has analyzed thoroughly.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">A husband</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">alimony</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">a wife</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Shiites Jurisprudents</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sunni Jurisprudents.</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_29816_9dea5482507cf8781d85d45f8574163e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
