<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>42</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>THE ECONOMIC PHILOSOPHY OF RIGHT TO REPLACEMENT AND RIGHT TO RETRACTION OF DETECTIVE GOODS AND THEIR POSITION IN IRANIAN LAW</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>THE ECONOMIC PHILOSOPHY OF RIGHT TO REPLACEMENT AND RIGHT TO RETRACTION OF DETECTIVE GOODS AND THEIR POSITION IN IRANIAN LAW</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>181</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>199</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">29823</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jlq.2012.29823</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohsen</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadeghi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zahra</FirstName>
					<LastName>Aghajani</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The most of researches on detective goods have emphasis on tort law i.e. restitution, negligence liability, strict liability and … therefore, they have not pay attention to the right to replacement and the right to restitution of detective goods; however, the mentioned rights are more economical and prior to restitution; particularly, there is no damage related to detective goods. This article tries to consider the economic philosophy of right to replacement and right to retraction of detective goods and their position in Iranian Law from the view of economic analysis of law.

The most of researches on detective goods have emphasis on tort law i.e.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The most of researches on detective goods have emphasis on tort law i.e. restitution, negligence liability, strict liability and … therefore, they have not pay attention to the right to replacement and the right to restitution of detective goods; however, the mentioned rights are more economical and prior to restitution; particularly, there is no damage related to detective goods. This article tries to consider the economic philosophy of right to replacement and right to retraction of detective goods and their position in Iranian Law from the view of economic analysis of law.

The most of researches on detective goods have emphasis on tort law i.e.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Consumer Rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Detective Goods</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Economic analysis of law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Iranian Law.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Right to Replacement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Right to Retraction</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_29823_b9f4964970b57807bad8d973764390b3.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
