<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>42</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>THE PRINCIPLE OF PRIVATE INITIATIVE IN CIVIL PROCEEDING AND ITS LIMITS &amp; RESTRICTIONS</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>THE PRINCIPLE OF PRIVATE INITIATIVE IN CIVIL PROCEEDING AND ITS LIMITS &amp; RESTRICTIONS</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>201</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>216</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">29824</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jlq.2012.29824</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Majid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghamami</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hassan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohseni</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Only the parties may institute a proceeding. They may put an end to the latter prior to its extinction by virtue of the court&#039;s decision or by virtue of the law. This is the principle, but it has some limits and restrictions by influences of social concepts of civil justice and the aim of administration of Law. Then the Judge also has the same right exceptionally. Forms and Times Limits, Judge&#039;s power to directing the proceeding &amp; finally ensuring the performance of good faith in civil proceeding have restricted our mentioned principle. We believe that all limits and restrictions can justify a theory which called The Cooperation of Parties and Judge Theory in Civil Proceeding.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Only the parties may institute a proceeding. They may put an end to the latter prior to its extinction by virtue of the court&#039;s decision or by virtue of the law. This is the principle, but it has some limits and restrictions by influences of social concepts of civil justice and the aim of administration of Law. Then the Judge also has the same right exceptionally. Forms and Times Limits, Judge&#039;s power to directing the proceeding &amp; finally ensuring the performance of good faith in civil proceeding have restricted our mentioned principle. We believe that all limits and restrictions can justify a theory which called The Cooperation of Parties and Judge Theory in Civil Proceeding.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Directing the Civil Procedure</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Good Faith.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Institution and End of Proceeding</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Judicial Initiative</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Principle of Private Initiative</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Times &amp; Forms</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_29824_f1ad4cc2190420a139b9ac68babde932.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
