<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>42</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>ENCOUNTERING POLITICK AND JUSTICE IN  ROME STATUTE</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>ENCOUNTERING POLITICK AND JUSTICE IN  ROME STATUTE</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>107</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>126</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">29952</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jlq.2012.29952</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Fereydoon</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jafari</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>After positive vote of 120 country to Rome statute and approval or accession of 114 country (almost tow third of world states) till the end of 2010, hopes to fight against impunity and ending barbarity entered to a new stage and achieving universal criminal justice goals as a new attitude of global criminal organizations like ICC in punishing core crimes criminals get dominant willing. But because this new tribunals affects states sovereignties and super power authorities or power abusers in breaching fundamental human rights (Noyau dur), a range of problematic countries refused accessing to Rome statute, so strongly tried to not allow the ICC achieving its goals and encountered justice against politick. This article analyses the most important political challenges of Rome statute.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">After positive vote of 120 country to Rome statute and approval or accession of 114 country (almost tow third of world states) till the end of 2010, hopes to fight against impunity and ending barbarity entered to a new stage and achieving universal criminal justice goals as a new attitude of global criminal organizations like ICC in punishing core crimes criminals get dominant willing. But because this new tribunals affects states sovereignties and super power authorities or power abusers in breaching fundamental human rights (Noyau dur), a range of problematic countries refused accessing to Rome statute, so strongly tried to not allow the ICC achieving its goals and encountered justice against politick. This article analyses the most important political challenges of Rome statute.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Core crimes.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hegemonization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Criminal Court</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Political challenges</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rome statute</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">State Sovereignty</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_29952_8c1fb717513201ea1c41030383eb6acb.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
