<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>42</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>THE RULE OF »PROTECTING POLITICAL SYSTEM« AND ITS DIMENSIONS IN ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>THE RULE OF »PROTECTING POLITICAL SYSTEM« AND ITS DIMENSIONS IN ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>21</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>40</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">31992</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jlq.2013.31992</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Asghar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Eftekhari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Political science, Imam Sadig (as) University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sadeghi</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.A. Student of Islamic Studies and private Law, Imam Sadig (as) University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>02</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>All Political Institutions Should Obey Public Law and be Legitimated by the mass. In this article there is a conceptual differentiation between »Protecting Political System Theory «(P.P.S.T) and »Public Law«, and others  referring to the Islamic Principles try give an answer to these question: What is the relationship between Protecting Political System duty and necessity of practicing »Public Law«  in Islamic Republic of Iran? In other word, Could P.P.S.T breach »Public Law« or not? The results Show that: P.P.S.T in Islamic Republic of Iran is an Islamic Instrument for achieving social aims of Law. So theoretically P.P.S.T and »Public Law« Could not be in contradiction with each other. In practice, if there was any contradiction, we Should solve it by referring to»Public Law« as the basic Principle for P.P.S.T.  </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">All Political Institutions Should Obey Public Law and be Legitimated by the mass. In this article there is a conceptual differentiation between »Protecting Political System Theory «(P.P.S.T) and »Public Law«, and others  referring to the Islamic Principles try give an answer to these question: What is the relationship between Protecting Political System duty and necessity of practicing »Public Law«  in Islamic Republic of Iran? In other word, Could P.P.S.T breach »Public Law« or not? The results Show that: P.P.S.T in Islamic Republic of Iran is an Islamic Instrument for achieving social aims of Law. So theoretically P.P.S.T and »Public Law« Could not be in contradiction with each other. In practice, if there was any contradiction, we Should solve it by referring to»Public Law« as the basic Principle for P.P.S.T.  </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Protecting Political System Theory</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Public law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Republic of Iran</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Republic</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_31992_1a36b06921020154c9c073498dbf56dd.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
