<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>PROPER LEGAL ENVIRONMENT FOR SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>PROPER LEGAL ENVIRONMENT FOR SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19219</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Scientific progress and development is one of the significant issues and hot debates of the Iranian government. There are some researches and seminars carried out and held regarding influential factors of scientific progress. Unfortunately there is no proper place for legal and institutional factors but exceptionally and partially (intellectual property rights factor).
My idea is that scientific progress without building a proper legal and institutional environment is impossible or unsustainable. So, in this essay, I tended to introduce some key factors of the mentioned environment by comparative an inductive methods. Those factors are: making law on research, protection of academic freedom, protection of freedom of thought and freedom of information, protection of intellectual properties, promotion of data sharing and regulation making on scientific parks and complexes and scientific associations.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Scientific progress and development is one of the significant issues and hot debates of the Iranian government. There are some researches and seminars carried out and held regarding influential factors of scientific progress. Unfortunately there is no proper place for legal and institutional factors but exceptionally and partially (intellectual property rights factor).
My idea is that scientific progress without building a proper legal and institutional environment is impossible or unsustainable. So, in this essay, I tended to introduce some key factors of the mentioned environment by comparative an inductive methods. Those factors are: making law on research, protection of academic freedom, protection of freedom of thought and freedom of information, protection of intellectual properties, promotion of data sharing and regulation making on scientific parks and complexes and scientific associations.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">academic freedom</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">freedom of expression</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Freedom of Information</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Intellectual Property</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">knowledge building</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Research law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">science and technology parks</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">scientific associations</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">scientific progress movement</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>NEW CHALLENGES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>NEW CHALLENGES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19220</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Because of its very dynamic nature and its close ties with global commerce, intellectual property law is one of the liveliest areas of law. The significant of this branch of law is manifested in the debate which is going on between developed and developing countries in terms of the scope of the protection of intellectual property rights. On the one hand, the developed country argue the stronger protection of intellectual property rights increases and facilitates the transfer of technology to the developing countries but, on the other hand, developing countries consider intellectual property rights as a means for development not an end by itself and as such are in favor some moderation in the scope and length of intellectual property rights. Moreover, in addition to the concept of development, the emergence and expansion of internet has also caused new developments in the field of intellectual property rights. These developments have posed new challenges which shall be discussed in this paper.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Because of its very dynamic nature and its close ties with global commerce, intellectual property law is one of the liveliest areas of law. The significant of this branch of law is manifested in the debate which is going on between developed and developing countries in terms of the scope of the protection of intellectual property rights. On the one hand, the developed country argue the stronger protection of intellectual property rights increases and facilitates the transfer of technology to the developing countries but, on the other hand, developing countries consider intellectual property rights as a means for development not an end by itself and as such are in favor some moderation in the scope and length of intellectual property rights. Moreover, in addition to the concept of development, the emergence and expansion of internet has also caused new developments in the field of intellectual property rights. These developments have posed new challenges which shall be discussed in this paper.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Globalization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Intellectual Property Rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Internet</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Substantive Patent Law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The Right to Development</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Traditional Knowledge</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Trips</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Web Casting</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>EXCUTIVE CAPABLITY OF 2001 DRAFT STATE RESPONSIBITY IN HUMAN RIGHTS RULES</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>EXCUTIVE CAPABLITY OF 2001 DRAFT STATE RESPONSIBITY IN HUMAN RIGHTS RULES</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19221</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The international responsibility of state, constitute one of the most important questions in the field of the international law. With adoption of draft article about state responsibility by ILC (2001), the subject of human rights, remain. In the other word, is this draft, include any field of state responsibility and any conduct arising from private actors, or the subject of human rights remind under other principles. This article discuss above question.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The international responsibility of state, constitute one of the most important questions in the field of the international law. With adoption of draft article about state responsibility by ILC (2001), the subject of human rights, remain. In the other word, is this draft, include any field of state responsibility and any conduct arising from private actors, or the subject of human rights remind under other principles. This article discuss above question.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">human rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Jus cogens</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Private actors</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">state responsibility</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>THE SET ASIDE OF DEBT AND ITS EFFECTS</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>THE SET ASIDE OF DEBT AND ITS EFFECTS</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19222</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Whenever there is a debt on someone, the debtor can pay back his debt and ask the creditor for a clearance. Should the creditor refuse to accept the debt, this could be construed as an abuse and harm to the debtor who can turn to the court or any other competent authority. The court or the other competent authority could accept the debt on behalf of the creditor. In case the debtor is not able to reach a court or a competent authority, he/she should ascertain and set aside the debt and is on longer responsible to guard the debt should it perish without his/her fault. Law shall not assign any responsibility to debtor to look after the property allocated to the debt, otherwise this allocation will not make sense. The treatment of any property derived from this debt which is allocated to the creditor but has not been handed over to him/her could a topic for debate.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Whenever there is a debt on someone, the debtor can pay back his debt and ask the creditor for a clearance. Should the creditor refuse to accept the debt, this could be construed as an abuse and harm to the debtor who can turn to the court or any other competent authority. The court or the other competent authority could accept the debt on behalf of the creditor. In case the debtor is not able to reach a court or a competent authority, he/she should ascertain and set aside the debt and is on longer responsible to guard the debt should it perish without his/her fault. Law shall not assign any responsibility to debtor to look after the property allocated to the debt, otherwise this allocation will not make sense. The treatment of any property derived from this debt which is allocated to the creditor but has not been handed over to him/her could a topic for debate.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Competent Authority</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">destruction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Harm</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Liability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">setting aside a debt</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">voluntary and involuntary substitute</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>LES MODALITES DE REVISION DES CONSTITUTIONS</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>LES MODALITES DE REVISION DES CONSTITUTIONS</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19223</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>La révision de la constitution consiste à corriger le texte constitutionnel par suppression, adjonction ou modification. Dans la plupart des cas, les constitutions contiennent des règles relatives à leurs propres modifications. Cet élément constitutif est en même temps leur partie matérielle, c’est-à-dire qui concerne la production des normes constitutionnelles.  Il s’agit de savoir à qui appartient et comment s&#039;exerce le pouvoir constituant chargé de modifier la constitution. La révision des constitutions qui suppose l’usage du pouvoir constituant entraîne la reconnaissance de ce pouvoir constituant à certains pouvoirs constitués. Le pouvoir de révision est un pouvoir qui s’exerce dans le cadre prévu par les constitutions. Ce cadre est appelé la procédure de révision constitutionnelle. Il existe selon les Etats une grande variété de procédures de révision des constitutions rigides. Si les constitutions souples se révisent aisément, selon la procédure d’adoption de la loi ordinaire, les constitutions rigides utilisent parfois une procédure en cinq phases : l’initiative, la décision de réviser, l’élaboration, l’approbation et la promulgation de la loi de révision constitutionnelle.Pour qu’une constitution soit à l’abri des mouvements, elle doit être ni trop rigide, ni trop souple.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">La révision de la constitution consiste à corriger le texte constitutionnel par suppression, adjonction ou modification. Dans la plupart des cas, les constitutions contiennent des règles relatives à leurs propres modifications. Cet élément constitutif est en même temps leur partie matérielle, c’est-à-dire qui concerne la production des normes constitutionnelles.  Il s’agit de savoir à qui appartient et comment s&#039;exerce le pouvoir constituant chargé de modifier la constitution. La révision des constitutions qui suppose l’usage du pouvoir constituant entraîne la reconnaissance de ce pouvoir constituant à certains pouvoirs constitués. Le pouvoir de révision est un pouvoir qui s’exerce dans le cadre prévu par les constitutions. Ce cadre est appelé la procédure de révision constitutionnelle. Il existe selon les Etats une grande variété de procédures de révision des constitutions rigides. Si les constitutions souples se révisent aisément, selon la procédure d’adoption de la loi ordinaire, les constitutions rigides utilisent parfois une procédure en cinq phases : l’initiative, la décision de réviser, l’élaboration, l’approbation et la promulgation de la loi de révision constitutionnelle.Pour qu’une constitution soit à l’abri des mouvements, elle doit être ni trop rigide, ni trop souple.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">assemblée constituante</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Congrès des deux chambres</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Constibution souple</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Constitution rigide</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">référendum</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>POTECTION OF THE RIGHT OF MINORITY EXISTENCE IN THE LIGHT OF PUNISHING ACTS OF GENOCIDE IN INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL JURISPRUDENCE</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>POTECTION OF THE RIGHT OF MINORITY EXISTENCE IN THE LIGHT OF PUNISHING ACTS OF GENOCIDE IN INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL JURISPRUDENCE</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19224</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the crime of Genocide was adopted by the UN General Assembly in December 1948. In former Yugoslavia and Rwanda occurred many heinous crimes and majority ruling powers tried to destroy Molem and totsi minority groups. The UN Security Council established the International Criminal Tribunal for The former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and Rwanda (ICTR). The UN Security Council considers that punishing perpetrators is a step to restore international peace and security. I try to show developments of contemporary international law on the protection of minorities by analyzing the practice of Ad hoc courts in finding actus reus and mens rea in particular.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the crime of Genocide was adopted by the UN General Assembly in December 1948. In former Yugoslavia and Rwanda occurred many heinous crimes and majority ruling powers tried to destroy Molem and totsi minority groups. The UN Security Council established the International Criminal Tribunal for The former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and Rwanda (ICTR). The UN Security Council considers that punishing perpetrators is a step to restore international peace and security. I try to show developments of contemporary international law on the protection of minorities by analyzing the practice of Ad hoc courts in finding actus reus and mens rea in particular.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">a national</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">as such which is mental and subjective factor</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ethnical</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">in whole or in part</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">racial or religious group</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">the intent to destroy</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>LA JUSTIFICATION LOGIQUE DE LA PREUVE JUDICIAIRE</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>LA JUSTIFICATION LOGIQUE DE LA PREUVE JUDICIAIRE</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19225</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Il s&#039;agit de déterminer la nature et les effets de la preuve judiciaire par rapport la logique formelle. A Cette fin nous l&#039;avons comparé cette notion juridique arec la conception de signe en logique et il est démontrer que la définition de cette dernière comprend également la preuve judiciaire, bien que celle- ci se réserve certaines spécificités. Nous avons essayé de réviser les différentes sortes de signification en logique formelle et de déplacer la preuve judiciaire (donc le signe) servant à prouver un droit personnel (donc la chose signifiée), au sein de cette discussion. Il est constaté qu&#039;en matière de preuve judiciaire, on est confronté à une sorte signification conventionnelle, bien que les deux autres significations se réservent certaines places en matière judiciaire. Nous en avons tire les conséquences pour déterminer le rôle du juge et des parties dans un procès civil en matière de preuve.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Il s&#039;agit de déterminer la nature et les effets de la preuve judiciaire par rapport la logique formelle. A Cette fin nous l&#039;avons comparé cette notion juridique arec la conception de signe en logique et il est démontrer que la définition de cette dernière comprend également la preuve judiciaire, bien que celle- ci se réserve certaines spécificités. Nous avons essayé de réviser les différentes sortes de signification en logique formelle et de déplacer la preuve judiciaire (donc le signe) servant à prouver un droit personnel (donc la chose signifiée), au sein de cette discussion. Il est constaté qu&#039;en matière de preuve judiciaire, on est confronté à une sorte signification conventionnelle, bien que les deux autres significations se réservent certaines places en matière judiciaire. Nous en avons tire les conséquences pour déterminer le rôle du juge et des parties dans un procès civil en matière de preuve.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">La justification logique</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">la preuve judiciaire</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">le rôle du juge et des  parties dans un procés civil en matiére de preuve</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">signification Conventionnelle</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">signification en logique formelle</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>SCOPE TO CRIMINALIZATION OF MONEY LAUNDERING IN INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS AND IRANIAN LEGAL SYSTEM</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>SCOPE TO CRIMINALIZATION OF MONEY LAUNDERING IN INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS AND IRANIAN LEGAL SYSTEM</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19226</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Money laundering is a serious threat to financial system of all countries  and  it leads to destruction of the country&#039;s sovereignty and character. This  has been widely recognized at the international level. Money laundering  as a crime only attracted interest in the 1980s, essentially within a drug trafficking context.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Money laundering is a serious threat to financial system of all countries  and  it leads to destruction of the country&#039;s sovereignty and character. This  has been widely recognized at the international level. Money laundering  as a crime only attracted interest in the 1980s, essentially within a drug trafficking context.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">money laundering</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">predicate offence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">serious crimes</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>CESSION OF CONTRACT</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>CESSION OF CONTRACT</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19227</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This article discusses the cession of contract. After presenting the definition of cession of contract, this base on contractual position and has an independent identity. By dividing the cession of contract in to executive and judiciary and contractual, their conditions are investigated. 
Finally the effects of cession of contract discussed.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This article discusses the cession of contract. After presenting the definition of cession of contract, this base on contractual position and has an independent identity. By dividing the cession of contract in to executive and judiciary and contractual, their conditions are investigated. 
Finally the effects of cession of contract discussed.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cession of contract</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">contractual cessions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">contractual position</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">executive cession</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">judiciary cession</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>EXAMINATION OF  WOMEN&#039;S &quot; DEEYE NAFS &quot; IN THE ISLAMIC PENAL CODE</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>EXAMINATION OF  WOMEN&#039;S &quot; DEEYE NAFS &quot; IN THE ISLAMIC PENAL CODE</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19228</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>One of the subjects which has recently been in the centre of attention of lawyers and supporters of women&#039;s rights is the issue of &quot;Deeye&quot; (financial remedy) written in the &quot;Islamic Penal Code&quot;.According to this Code, &quot;Deeye Nafs&quot; for a woman is half of the &quot;Deeye Nafs&quot; for a man. For example, when a man murders a woman, the killed woman&#039;s family has to pay half of the man&#039;s &quot;Deeye Nafs&quot; to the killer before he is been executed. Apart from the protest by some supporters of women&#039;s rights, some lawyers, jurists and experts in Islamic law, have criticized the said rule, saying that this rule is not consistent with Sharia (Islamic Law).On the other hand, some lawyers and experts in Islamic law seriously support this rule, believing that it is perfectly consistent with Islamic law. They also opposite to any change and amendment in this respect.  This article, however, while has examined these two part of views and their reasons, tries to present a solution for prevailing this problem.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">One of the subjects which has recently been in the centre of attention of lawyers and supporters of women&#039;s rights is the issue of &quot;Deeye&quot; (financial remedy) written in the &quot;Islamic Penal Code&quot;.According to this Code, &quot;Deeye Nafs&quot; for a woman is half of the &quot;Deeye Nafs&quot; for a man. For example, when a man murders a woman, the killed woman&#039;s family has to pay half of the man&#039;s &quot;Deeye Nafs&quot; to the killer before he is been executed. Apart from the protest by some supporters of women&#039;s rights, some lawyers, jurists and experts in Islamic law, have criticized the said rule, saying that this rule is not consistent with Sharia (Islamic Law).On the other hand, some lawyers and experts in Islamic law seriously support this rule, believing that it is perfectly consistent with Islamic law. They also opposite to any change and amendment in this respect.  This article, however, while has examined these two part of views and their reasons, tries to present a solution for prevailing this problem.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">"Deeye"</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Equality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">"Ghesas"</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Penal Code	Woman</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">woman</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>THE THRD GENERALTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RIGHT TO HEALTY ENVIRONMENT</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>THE THRD GENERALTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RIGHT TO HEALTY ENVIRONMENT</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19229</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract></Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Environmental Approach</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Environment as Human Rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Humanitarian Approach</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Individual Claims in the Environmental Cases</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Instruments Concerning Right to  Environment</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Right to  Access to Environmental Information</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Right to compensation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Right to Healthy Environment</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Right to  Participation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Solidarity rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Third Generation of Human Right</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>REVISING THE CAUSATIVENESS OF HEYAZAT IN POSSESSION</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>REVISING THE CAUSATIVENESS OF HEYAZAT IN POSSESSION</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19230</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Since in Imamiyeh jurisprudence and civil law, Heyazat Mobahat have been considered as the causes of possession, so that in this article, a brief report is presented on causes of possession, different means to gain possession, and also topics such as unity or diversity of causativeness of Ehya and Heyazat, terms of Heyazat and Ehya and the evidences of those who believe in causativeness of Heyazat in land possession and its assessment, permission of government in Heyzat and preparation of uncultivated land in the view of the believers in Heyzat of uncultivated lands, Mobahat, commonalities and its most important types are discussed. Causativeness, limit of ownership, base and criteria of establishment of possession in the light of &quot;Heyazat&quot; are the preoccupations of this article.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Since in Imamiyeh jurisprudence and civil law, Heyazat Mobahat have been considered as the causes of possession, so that in this article, a brief report is presented on causes of possession, different means to gain possession, and also topics such as unity or diversity of causativeness of Ehya and Heyazat, terms of Heyazat and Ehya and the evidences of those who believe in causativeness of Heyazat in land possession and its assessment, permission of government in Heyzat and preparation of uncultivated land in the view of the believers in Heyzat of uncultivated lands, Mobahat, commonalities and its most important types are discussed. Causativeness, limit of ownership, base and criteria of establishment of possession in the light of &quot;Heyazat&quot; are the preoccupations of this article.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Commonalities</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Heyazat</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Land preparation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mines</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mobahat</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">uncultivated lands</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Waters</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>MATRIMONIAL RIGHTS IN MARRIAGE PORTION AND THE PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>MATRIMONIAL RIGHTS IN MARRIAGE PORTION AND THE PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19231</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract></Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Choses in action</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">choses in possession</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">khol divorce</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">marriage portion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">rajei divorce</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>PHILOSOPHICAL JUSTIFICATIONS OF PUNISHMENT; FROM SINGULARISM TO PLURALISM</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>PHILOSOPHICAL JUSTIFICATIONS OF PUNISHMENT; FROM SINGULARISM TO PLURALISM</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19232</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Why we punish? This is an old question for philosophers and scientists of criminal law. Classical answer to this question is retributirism or utilitarianism. Because these justifications don&#039;t enough for justify of punishment, the new justifications trend to compromise them together.
In this article, the writer will research strong retributivism and utilitarianism and after reveal weak points of them, and finally  analyses some of important compromising theories in criminal law.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Why we punish? This is an old question for philosophers and scientists of criminal law. Classical answer to this question is retributirism or utilitarianism. Because these justifications don&#039;t enough for justify of punishment, the new justifications trend to compromise them together.
In this article, the writer will research strong retributivism and utilitarianism and after reveal weak points of them, and finally  analyses some of important compromising theories in criminal law.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pluralism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Punishment</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Retributivism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Singularism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Utilitarianism</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Law Quarterly</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-5618</Issn>
				<Volume>37</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2007</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>-</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>-</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19233</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>-</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">-</OtherAbstract>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
