Subject of this article is the deprivation that relate to wives and their portion in patrimony of their husband. As most Imamiah’s jurists state; wives are deprived from possessing some objects in the case of husband’s death. In the other hand, some jurists mentioned that wives are same as other and that deprivation is not acceptable. Majority states that this statute belongs to a kind of wives that has no child. In the other hand minority states that this deprivation is belong to all wifes without any exclusion.Topic of this article is consideration of proofs in this case.
Subject of this article is the deprivation that relate to wives and their portion in patrimony of their husband. As most Imamiah’s jurists state; wives are deprived from possessing some objects in the case of husband’s death.
Amid Zanjani, A., & Fooladi Savadkoohi, E. (2011). CONSIDERATION IN VIEWS OF IMAMIEH'S JURISTS IN SUBJECT OF DEPRIVATION FROM SOME PATRIMONY. Law Quarterly, 41(4), 273-291.
MLA
Abbasali Amid Zanjani; Ebrahim Fooladi Savadkoohi. "CONSIDERATION IN VIEWS OF IMAMIEH'S JURISTS IN SUBJECT OF DEPRIVATION FROM SOME PATRIMONY", Law Quarterly, 41, 4, 2011, 273-291.
HARVARD
Amid Zanjani, A., Fooladi Savadkoohi, E. (2011). 'CONSIDERATION IN VIEWS OF IMAMIEH'S JURISTS IN SUBJECT OF DEPRIVATION FROM SOME PATRIMONY', Law Quarterly, 41(4), pp. 273-291.
VANCOUVER
Amid Zanjani, A., Fooladi Savadkoohi, E. CONSIDERATION IN VIEWS OF IMAMIEH'S JURISTS IN SUBJECT OF DEPRIVATION FROM SOME PATRIMONY. Law Quarterly, 2011; 41(4): 273-291.
)