THE EFFECT OF SET-OFF ON DEMAND AND RECOVERY OF BANK GUARANTEES

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor of shiraz university at private law

2 Master of science at private law, shiraz university

Abstract

Bank guarantee is one of the most efficient financial instruments that what is the importance of its role in the process of signing the contracts and transactions is the independence of the underlying contract between the beneficiary and principal and the contract for issuing the guarantee between guarantor and principal. Due to these characteristics, if the principal fails to perform his obligations in underlying contract, Beneficiary can demand guarantee without having to prove negligence. During the demand of guarantee it’s possible to be resorted to set-off by principal and guarantor. In view of the above-mentioned relations between principal and guarantor, principal and beneficiary and guarantor and beneficiary and set-off that prevent from prolongation of mutual payments, it must see that in which relationship can be relied on set-off against beneficiary? According to the concept of independence guarantee, the only guarantor can invoke to set-off for mutual demands against beneficiary and then to be innocent of his debts. The same approach was also adopted in international and domestic regulations.

Keywords


  1. الف) فارسی

    1.  اسکینی، ربیعا (1389)، حقوق تجارت (برات، سفته، قبض انبار، اسناد در وجه حامل و چک)، چ چهاردهم، تهران: سمت.
    2. سربازیان، مجید؛ زبرجد، سیده فاطمه (1393)، «تهاتر در فقه امامیه، حقوق ایران و تجارت بین‌الملل»، فصلنامۀ پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب، سال اول، ش 1.
    3. سلطانی، محمد (1390)، حقوق بانکی، چ اول، تهران: میزان.
    4. ---------- (1392)، «مطالبۀ وجه ضمانت‌نامه بانکی»، فصلنامۀ پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، دورۀ 2، ش 5.
    5. شهیدی، مهدی (1392)، سقوط تعهدات، چ هفتم، تهران: مجد.
    6. شیروی، عبدالحسین (1392)، حقوق تجارت بین‌الملل، چ پنجم، تهران: سمت.
    7. صفایی، سید حسین (1389)، قواعد عمومی قراردادها، چ هشتم، تهران: میزان.
    8. فتحی‌پور، علی (1369)، «ضمانت در معاملات بین‌المللی»، مجلۀ حقوقی دفتر خدمات حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 13.
    9. کاتوزیان، ناصر (1382)، حقوق مدنی: نظریۀ عمومی تعهدات، چ دوم، تهران: میزان.
    10. ----------- (1390)، قانون مدنی در نظم حقوقی کنونی، چ بیست‌ونهم، تهران: میزان.
    11. کاشانی، محمود (1374و1375)، «ضمانت‌نامۀ بانکی»، مجلۀ تحقیقات حقوقی، ش 16و17.
    12. مافی، همایون؛ فلاح، مهدی (1392)، «خصیصه‌های اسنادی و ضمانتی اعتبار اسنادی تضمینی در حقوق تجارت بین‌الملل»، پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، دورۀ 17، ش 2.
    13.  محبی، محسن (1375)، «ضمانت‌نامه‌های بانکی در رویۀ دیوان داوری دعاوی ایران- ایالات متحده»، مجلۀ حقوقی دفتر خدمات حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 20.

     

    ب) لاتین

    14. Berger,klaus Peter. (2005), set-off-in:ICC Bull.(special supplement). at 17 et seq.

    15.Bertrams, Roeland. (2004), bank Guarantees in International Trade. Hague: Kluwer Law international.

    16.Davidson, Alan. (2010),”Fraud and the UN Convention on Independent Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit”. International Commercial Law, Vol.1, Issue.1.

    17. Davidson, Alan.(2012),Unconscionability in Letters of Credit and Demand

    Guarantee Transactions.”International Journal of Technology Policy and Law, Vol.1.

    18. Hsin Hsu, Chung.(2006),”the Independence of Demand Guarantees, Performance Bonds and Standby Letters of Credit”. National Taiwan University Law Review.

    19. Johns, Roger j- Blodget, Mark S. (2011),”Fairness at the Expense of Commercial Certainty: The International Emergence of Unconscionability and Illegality as Exceptions to the Independence of Letters of credit and Bank Guarantees.” Northern Illinios University Law Review, Vol.31.

    20. Kelly-louw, Michelle. (2009), Limiting Exceptions to the Autonomy Principle of Demand Guarantees and Letters of Credit. University of South Africa.

    21. Pierce, Anthony. (1993), Demand Guarantee in International Trade. 1ed, London: Sweet & Maxwell.

    22. saleeby, Ramsey.(2010),”Contracting out of United Nations Convention on Independent Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit.” International Commercial Law, Vol.1, Issue.1.

    23. Shmittoff, Clive M.).1990,( The Law & Practice of International Trade. 19th ed, London: Stevens & Sons.

    24. SP Wong, Adrian. (2000),Restraining a Call on a Performance Bond:should ‘Fraud or Unconscionability’ Be the New Orthodoxy?.” Singapoor Academy of Law Journal, Vol.12.

    25.Taylor, Hilary.(2010),”Nothing Is Over Until We Decide It Is”. International Commercial Law, Vol.1, Issue.1.

    26. Xiang, Gao. (2010),”The Fraud Rule under the UN Convention on Independent Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit: A Significant Contribution from an International Prespective”. International Commercial Law, Vol.1, Issue.1.

    27-http://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19741016_0040192.CA.htm/qx.[25 Dec 2015].