There are two types of questions in legal studies: questions that pertain to the rules of law, and questions that concern its relevant subjects. Accordingly, there are two types of reasoning that are used for finding answers to these different types of questions: legal reasoning and judicial reasoning. The question concerns the logic of reasoning in law in each of the following three stages: proving the imputability of facts to the defendant; identification and legal description of the facts; and discovering the stance and rules of law of the legislator in view of the case in point. The present study attempts to explicate the structure and proses of the logic of law. The present study draws upon a descriptive and analytical (rational and reasonable) methodology that will be applied according to the nature of the topic under study. Based on the findings of the present work, the logic of legal and judicial reasoning has a combinatory nature. Although it appears to follow the Aristotelian formal logic, in researching the content of the premises of reasoning and proving imputability of subjects to individuals, the logic of reasoning, according to the nature of the subjects as well as the research sources, benefits from a hermeneutical method, rational and reasonable analysis, deductive reasoning, and literary and linguistic rules.
آرائی، حمید؛ شهابی، مهدی؛ دهباشی، مهدی (1398). «تأملی بر رابطۀ حقوق و ایدئولوژی و تأثیر آن بر کثرت استدلال حقوقی»، فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، دورۀ 49، ش 4، ص 580-561.
بیکس، برایان (1389). فرهنگ نظریۀ حقوقی، ترجمۀ محمد راسخ، تهران: نشر نی.
پاپکین، ریچارد؛ استرول، آوروم (1370). کلیات فلسفه، ترجمه و اضافات: سید جلال‌الدین مجتبوی، تهران: حکمت.
جعفری تبار، حسن (1388). فلسفۀ تفسیری حقوق، چ اول، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (1371). مقدمۀ عمومی علم حقوق، تهران: کتابخانۀ گنج دانش.
حبیبی، حسن (1373). منطق حقوقی و انفورماتیک حقوقی، چ اول، تهران: اطلاعات.
خندان، سید علی‌اصغر (1379). منطق کاربردی، تهران: سمت و طه.
سیمایی صراف، حسین (1395). قیاس در استدلال حقوقی، چ سوم، تهران: شهر دانش.
الشریف، محمدمهدی (1397). منطق حقوق، چ چهارم، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
Alexy, R (1989). A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification,Oxford: Clarendon.
Boonin, Leonard. G (1965). “The logic of Legal Decisions”, Ethics, Published by: The University of Chicago Press, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 179-194.
Cohen Morris A (1916). “The place of Logic in the Law”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 622-639.
Ellsworth Phoebe. G (2005). “Legal reasoning”, In the Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and reasoning,edited by k. j. holy oak and R.G Morrison Jr., New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 685- 704.
Hage, J (1997). “A Theory of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match”,OnLogical Model of Legal Argumentation, Springer- Science + Business Media, B.V, pp. 43-118.
Hallaq Wael B (1985-1986). “the Logic of Legal Reasoning in Religious and Non-Religious Cultures: the Case of Islamic Law and the Common Law”, Cleveland State Law Review, vol. 34, No. 79, pp. 79-96.
Levi, E. H (1948). “An Introduction of Legal Reasoning”, the University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 501- 574.
Mullock Philip (1966). “The "Logic" of Legal Reasoning”, Mind, New Series, Vol. 75, No. 297, pp. 128-130.
Spellman Barbara. A & Schauer Frederick (2012). “Legal Reasoning”, K. J. Holy oak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (2nd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-49.
Wahlgren Peter. (2009) .“Legal Reasoning; A Jurisprudential Model”, Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 199-282.
Walton Douglas (2018). “Legal Reasoning and Argumentation”, On the: Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation, Springer Nature B.V, pp. 47-75.
د) فرانسوی
Pansier Frédéric-Jérôme (1997). Méthodologie du droit,Paris: Editions Litec.
Perelman Ch. (1979). Méthodes du Droit, Deuxième édition, Paris: Dalloz.
Troper Michel (2006). La philosophie du droit,Paris, Presses universitaires de France.
)
