The divorce is a unilateral obligation that exists by independent will of husband, but it does not mean that he can injury to the wife, by exert his right. In this essay we believe that if using of this right culminated in incurring of wife, the husband must redress it. In the direction of analysis of the fundaments of this subject, we study the content of 11th article of the abrogated family protection code and propose that its purport should be passed again, because it is not irreligious but it is very justly, useful and effective on decreasing of the disadvantages of the divorce. According to that article, the judge can bind every one of husband and wife to redress the damage of the other one by pay allowance on the condition that he was not guilty in divorce.