In an era of information technology, businesses, through the use of the boundless Internet, can enter into international electronic contracts from anywhere in the world. The potential for cross-border disputes in electronic contracts is obviously much greater than in a paper-based environment, where a high degree of commercial contracts are domestic in nature. Can the traditional rules on jurisdiction, which are geographically orientated and generally rely on the place of performance, apply to the modern electronic contract disputes? This paper will analyse the EU and US approaches for determining jurisdiction in e-contracting cases and discuss the possibility of proposing specific jurisdiction rules for online contracts.
Karimi, A., & Kaviar, H. (2010). JUDICIAL COMPETENCE IN CLAIMS OF INTERNET CONTRACTS CASE STUDY: ANALYSIS OF THE EU AND US LAWS. Law Quarterly, 40(101), -.
MLA
Abbas Karimi; Hossein Kaviar. "JUDICIAL COMPETENCE IN CLAIMS OF INTERNET CONTRACTS CASE STUDY: ANALYSIS OF THE EU AND US LAWS". Law Quarterly, 40, 101, 2010, -.
HARVARD
Karimi, A., Kaviar, H. (2010). 'JUDICIAL COMPETENCE IN CLAIMS OF INTERNET CONTRACTS CASE STUDY: ANALYSIS OF THE EU AND US LAWS', Law Quarterly, 40(101), pp. -.
VANCOUVER
Karimi, A., Kaviar, H. JUDICIAL COMPETENCE IN CLAIMS OF INTERNET CONTRACTS CASE STUDY: ANALYSIS OF THE EU AND US LAWS. Law Quarterly, 2010; 40(101): -.
)