نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار گروه حقوق دانشکدة علوم انسانی دانشگاه گیلان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Absence of enough connection between forum and action is principal reason for existence of exorbitant jurisdiction. Some jurisdictional rules such as conclusion place of contract in the historical ground especially revolution of communication instrument has lost its logical ground. Because of political interest such as protection of forum nationals, spite of states increasing cooperation has been yet remained unfair rules of jurisdiction. Exorbitant jurisdiction based on nationality has been preserved in French and in the light of Brussels 1 has finded extraordinary development. Courts In U.S. with expansive interpretation of minimum contact criteria, has justified exorbiant jurisdictionsderived from transient or attachment. Reexamination of jurisdictional ruleson the base of necessaryconnection between forum and action and also conclusion of international agreements will safe international private relations from agitated decisions grounds on political purposes and provide causes of just litigation in the meantime of preserving of litigant parties rights.
کلیدواژهها [English]
الف) فارسی
ب) انگلیسی
1. Clermont, Kevin (2006) Exorbitant Jurisdiction, Maine Law Review, Vol. 58:2
2. Eng, Emily (2012)A New Paradigm: Domicile As The Exclusive Basis For The Exercise Of General Jurisdiction Over Individual Defendants, Cardozo Law Review , Vol. 32:845
3. Freer, Richard (2013) American and European Approaches to Personal Jurisdiction Based Upon Internet Activity, Emory University School of Law, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 07-15, http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1004887
4.Grossi, Simon (2012) Rethinking the Harmonization of Jurisdictional Rules, Tulane Law Review, Vol.86:623
5. Gottschalk, Eckart (2007) Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World, Cambridge University Press
6. Hartley, Trevor (2009) International Commercial Litigation, Cambridge University Press
7. http://curia.europa.eu/common/recdoc/convention/en/c-textes/2001r0044.htm Last visited 2014/6/1
8. Jerker, Dan (2007) Private International Law and Internet, Kluwer international Law, First edition
9. Magnus Ulrich, Mankowski Peter (2007) European Commentaries on Private International Law, Brussels I Regulation, Sellier. European Law Publishers
10. Mills, Alex (2009) the Confluence of Public and Private International Law, Cambridge University Press
11. O’Brien, John (1999) Conflict of Laws, Second Edition, Cavendish Publishing Limited
12. Parrish, Austen (2006) Sovereignty, Not Due Process: Personal Jurisdiction over Nonresident Alien Defendant, Wake Forest Law Review, Volume 41
13. Palmer, John R.B., Clermont, Kevin M, (2004) French Article 14 Jurisdiction, Viewed from the United States. Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 13,http://scholarship.law.cornell. scholarship.law.cornell.edu/lsrp_papers/13
)