عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]چکیده [English]
Jurisprudence, in its strict sense which is binding, is regarded as one of the important sources of law. This article seeks by relying on some judgments issued by general board of Administrative Justice Court concerning the Social Security Organization summarily investigate some deficiencies in performances of the Social Security Organization and Administrative Justice Court. In short, the enactment by the organization of some mandatory rules or extending the scope of statutes through issuing regulations may be considered as the most important critique in respect of the Social Security Organization performance. The most important critiques of Administrative Justice Court may be summarized as follows: literal interpretation of law, non attention to legal principles in particular those governing over social security, non attention to legal regulations and non attention to the legal authority of Social Security Organization.