عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]چکیده [English]
Future invocation of evidences that their truth have been investigated in the previous case can be useful or necessary. It is especially important when secondary presentation of evidences has been impossible or difficult. In this article we are trying to know what must the court do against evidences that were considered in another proceedings. It must study if the court have to accept evaluation of the previous court or it is free; Another possibility is prohibition of accepting the previous evaluation. Our subject is important from the viewpoint of convenience on establishment of allegation, shorten of proceedings and also in the point of view of length of proceedings. If present court was obliged or even free to accept previous evaluation, then reconsideration of such evidences wont be necessary and the mere revocation of the previous case will be efficient.