نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار حقوق خصوصی و اقتصادی دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
2 دانشجوی مقطع دکتری دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
If a third party or execution of judicial decisions and judgments issued by the courts, he could be detrimental to the rights of their protests notify the competent authority. The basic difference in votes and protests against third-party claims administration will be different to hear a third party so that the main challenge in court the final judgment comes the court has handed down the verdict is submitted. The competent court to handle third objection executive, is controversial; some know and some say issuing court to the competent court of jurisdiction is the executor of the sentence. And some consider both the righteous. Jurisdiction of the court executor, the legal reasoning more. Some opinions issued by the Supreme Court and the provisions of Articles 26 and 142 of the Civil Law enforcement and legal doctrine, supporting the idea. And some consider both the righteous. Jurisdiction of the court executor, the legal reasoning more. Some opinions issued by the Supreme Court.
کلیدواژهها [English]