نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق الهیات و علوم اسلامی دانشگاه پیام نور
3 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی مرکز تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه پیام نور
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In accordance with the opinion of lawyers, the trade secrets are considered as intellectual properties. In the intellectual property system, in order to protect creativity and intellectual works, two types of economic and moral rights are devoted to the creators and owners of them. Moral rights are typically non-monetary concessions that are created to support the personality of the creators. Unlike economic rights, they are not limited to time and place. In industrial properties, unlike literary and artistic works, the importance of moral rights has diminished in terms of focusing on commercial interests. This has been intensified due to the unique nature of trade secrets, since the creativity, originality and even the novelty of the intellectual works are not important, and it is enough to take the reasonable safeguards to keep them confidential. Therefore, in written sources, there is no trace of the moral rights of the owners of trade secrets. Our findings suggest that the concept of "privacy" could be the basis for the formation of moral rights for the owners of trade secrets. Accordingly, "maintaining the confidentiality of information" and "disclosing secrets in the form of invention, compilation, and etc." are the two rights that can be justified by the mentioned concept. Since the initiation source of such rights (i.e. the occurrence of information in the owner's privacy) is not their reason and since these rights are not the main cause for the creation of an object and are not also reserved for the person holding the secrets, it is essential to consider the rights in question as voluntarily and coercively transferable.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
الف) فارسی و عربی
ب) خارجی
1. Adler, Amy M., (2009). “Against Moral Rights”, CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, Vol. 97, Issue 1, Article 6, pp: 263-300
2. Kathryn A. Kelly (1994). Moral Rights and the First Amendment: Putting Honor Before Free Speech? , 11 U. Miami Ent. & Sports L. Rev. 211.
3. Claire, Leonard, (2012). “Copyright, moral rights and the first amendment: The problem of integrity and compulsory speech”, Columbia University Academic Commons, https://doi.org/10.7916/D8FR068Q.
4. Henry L. Self III, (2003), “Moral Rights and Musicians in the United States”, 2003-2004 Entertainment, Publishing and the Arts Handbook 165, Aa: http://www.lavelysinger.com/MoralRights.pdf
5. Mark A. Petrolis, (2008). “An Immoral Fight: Shielding Moral Rights with First Amendment Jurisprudence When Fair Use Battles with Actual Malice”, 8 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. pp:190-215.
6. Palmer, Tom G, (Summer 1990). “Are patents and copyrights morally justified? The philosophy of property rights and Ideal Objects”, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 13, No. 3: 817–65.
7. W.R. Cornish, (2001). Cases and Materials on intellectual property, fourth edition, London, sweet & Maxwell.
)