نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار، گروه حقوق خصوصی و اقتصادی، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
In Persian and French language, the word "cause" is used in various senses. In everyday language, this word means: for, because of, reason, origin, source, etc. and in French it designates the origin of a state or a circumstance. In legal language, the term Cause of Action is essential to a Civil Suit, since without a Cause of Action a Civil Suit cannot arise. in Iranian civil procedure and In French civil procedure cause has always been a controversial and ambiguous concept. The Cause is used in Articles 15, 17, 98, and 141 of the Iranian Civil Procedure Law of 2000. The word "cause" is still used in another sense when it comes to the substance of the law.
Methodology
This research is descriptive and analytical, comparative and is based on the library resources method.
Conclusion
The main questions raised in this research are: What is the difference between “cause” and similar terms such as source of obligation? What is the meaning of the term "unity of cause” used in Iranian civil procedure law? What is the relationship between "cause" and qualification in the civil procedures of Iran and France?
It seems the term (jahat in Persian) mentioned in Article 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure 2000 include both the cause and “des moyens”. There is also a difference between cause and the “des moyens”. In fact, jajat (in Persian) is more general than the cause. For example, in the case of declaring the cancellation of the sale based on the option of delaying the price or the option of violation of the description, the sale contract is the “cause" and the option of delaying the price or the option of violation of the description is the moyen. And the existence of the cause and the moyen together form the jahat (in Persian).
Also, the unity of cause is different from the description, so for example, when the plaintiff declares that in the contract between him and the defendant, it is specified that there will be no contract if any of the checks are not paid, and he claims that the checks have not been paid and he has written the title of his lawsuit as termination of the contract, but before the first hearing according to Article 98 of the Civil Procedure Law 2000, he amends the subject of his lawsuit to declaration of Rescission, the unity of cause is preserved. Because in these cases, only the description of the request has changed, and the cause, that is, the legal behaviour from which the claimed right originates, has not changed.
Also, in the issue of amending the title of the claim, in cases where the title of the claim changes from the obligation to fulfil the obligation (such as the obligation to deliver the goods) to the declaration of invalidity of the contract before the first hearing, the unity of cause, which according to Article 98 is one of the conditions for amendment The title is still exists. Because in examining the existence of the cause, we are dealing with the physical and behavioural aspect of the done work, and its legal validity is not taken into consideration in terms of whether the done legal act is correct or invalid. In this case, even if the contract is invalid, there is still the condition of unity of cause, which is necessary to amend the title of the petition. In fact, in this sense, the invalid contract is presented as a "document and reason to prove the claim".
Unlike French civil procedure, in Iran, the cause is Absolute presumption or legal presumption to determine the connection between related claims and incidental claims, which cannot be destroyed by any evidence to the contrary.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
منابع
الف) فارسی
https://lawresearchmagazine.sbu.ac.ir/article_56145.html (3 اردیبهشت 1402)
ب) عربی
ج) آرای قضایی
د) خارجی
- انگلیسی
47. Martin E. (2006). Oxford dictionary of law. 6 ed, London: oxford universtity press.
- فرانسه
48. Anne-Blandine C. (2010). Relecture du droit des présomptions à la lumière du droit européen des droits de l'Homme,Thèse , L'université de Limoges,Directeur de recherches: Jean-Pierre MARGUÉNAUD.
49. Aubry C. et Rau F. (1953). Droit civil français. 6° éd. par P. Esmein, TV.
50. Berriat P. (1813). Cours de procédure civile, Paris, Nêve.
51. Bouty C. (2018). Chose jugéeو Répertoire de procédure civile.
52. Fourcarde J. (1938). La connexité en procédure civile, thèse, Paris.
53. Motulsky H. (1964). “La cause de la demande dans la délimitation de l’office du juge”, in Ecrits et notes de procédure civile.
54. Normand J. (1995)Cour de Cassation, Assemblée plénière, 3 juin 1994, N° de pourvoi: 92-12.157, Décision attaquée: Cour d'appel de Douai, 1992-01-20, du 20 janvier 1992, revue trimestrielle de droit civil.
55. Planiol M., Ripert G. et Hamel J. (1961). tr, parat, Traité pratique de droit civil français,T.x2e éd. par J. Boulanger.
56. Rochfeld J. (2012). Professeur à l'École de droit de la Sorbonne, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Cause, Répertoire de droit civil.
57. Yves P.(2017). Professeur à l'Université de Perpignan Via Domitia Responsable du Centre de droit de la concurrence Y. S. (EA CDED), Obligations, Répertoire de droit civil.
- سایت‌ها
60.https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/
61. https://ara.jri.ac.ir/
)