الف) فارسی:
1. حبیبا، سعید و شاکری، زهرا (1392)، سه گام؛ آزمونی فراروی مصرف کنندگان آثار ادبی و هنری،مجله تحقیقات حقوقی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، شمارۀ 61، بهار 1392، ص248-209.
2. شاکری، زهرا و حبیبا ، سعید (1392)،اشتراک سازی آثار ادبی و هنری؛ چالش‌ها و فرصت‌ها، مجلۀ دانش حقوق مدنی، سال دوم، شمارۀ اول، بهار و تابستان 92، ص11-1.
3. شاکری، زهرا (1394)، معیارهای بهینه‌سازی مقررات محدودیت‌ها و استثنائات در نظام حقوق مالکیت ادبی و هنری؛ راهنمایی برای حقوق ایران،پنجمین همایش حقوق مالکیت ادبی و هنری وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی،تهران، تالار وحدت،چهاردهم اردیبهشت 1394، ص19-1.
ب) خارجی:
1.Christina Bohannan,(2008), “Copyright Preemption of Contracts” (2008) Maryland Law Review, Vol. 67, p. 616, online: SSRN<http://ssrn.com/abstract=1138251>.
2.Jacques de Werra, (2003) , "Moving Beyond the Conflict Between Freedom of Contract and Copyright Policies: In Search of a New Global Policy for On-Line Information Licensing Transactions: A Comparative Analysis Between U.S.Law and European Law" Vol. 25, No. 4,239 at 258, online: SSRN<http://ssrn.com/abstract=2149796> [de Werra].
4.Griffin , James GH(2010),
An Historical Solution to the legal challenges posed by peer-to-peer file sharing and digital rights management technology, journal of Computer, Media and Telecommunications Law, Vol. 15, No. 78, pp.1-25. Electronic copy available at: <
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2001171>.
5.McLennan, Paul,(2007), Getting Copyright, Published Heritage Branch.
6.Middleton, Kent R, (2003),U.S Copyright Issues in Digital Publishing, Chapter 4, in "Copyright and Consequences" Becker, Lee b &Valad Tudor, Hampton Press, pp. 57-58.
2012/2/5.
8.Nolan, Jason M,(2011), The Role of Transformative Use: Revisiting the Fourth Circuit’s Fair Use Opinions inBouchat v. Baltimore Ravens, Virginia Journal of Law & Technology, Vol.16, No.04, pp. 569-572.
10.Stewart,DaxtonR.Chip(2012),cani use this photo I found on facebook? Applying copyright law and fair use analysis to photographs on social networking sites republished for news reporting purposes,Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, Vol. 10, No. 1,pp.93-101,Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/
- پرونده‌های قضایی
11.Beal v. Paramount Pictures (1994) 20 F.3d 454 at 56 (US Court of Appeals, 11th Cir.)
12.Bateman v.Mnemonics,Inc., 79F.3d1532(11thCir.1996).
13.Campbell v. Acuff-Ros Music, Inc, 510 U.S.569.578(1994).
14.CCH Canadian v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR at para 48, online: CanLII
15.<http://canlii.ca/t/1glp0> [CCH].
16.Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537U.S.186,219, 221(2003)(Describing Fair Use as a Free Speech Safeguard).
17.Entrance Examination Board v .Cuomo, 788 F.Supp.134(N.D.N.Y.1992).
18.Folsom v. Marsh, F. Cas. 342 (C.C.D. Mass. 1841)(No. 4901).
19.Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985)
20.Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811, 815 (9th Cir. 2003).
21.New York Times Co v. Roxbury Data Interface, Inc,434 F.Supp.217(1977).
22.Nunez v. Caribbean Int’l News Corp., 235 F.3d 18, 25 (1st Cir. 2000).
23.Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146, 1164-65 (9th Cir. 2007).
24.ProCD, Inc v Zeidenberg, 86 F3d 1447 (7th Cir 1996).
25.Théberge v Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain inc, 2002 SCC 34, [2002] 2 SCR at para 31, online: CanLII
26.<http://canlii.ca/t/51tn> [Théberge].
27.Sony Corp. of Am. V. Universal City studios,Inc, 464 U.S.417.(1984).
28.Warner Brothers &etcv.RDR, 575F.Supp.2d 513(S.D.N.Y.2008).
)