حل تعارض در رسیدگی به دعاوی خسارت‌های ناشی از فعالیت‌های هسته‌ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

2 کارشناس ارشد حقوق خصوصی دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

از آنجا که فعالیت‌های هسته‌ای، گاه خسارتی فراتر از مرزهای کشور متصدی تأسیسات آن به وجود می‌آورند، در برخی موارد دعاوی مربوط به خسارت‌های ناشی از فعالیت‌های هسته‌ای، جنبۀ بین‌المللی به خود می‌گیرند. کنوانسیون‌های متعددی به‌منظور تدوین مقررات درخصوص این خسارات تصویب شده‌اند و در تعیین دادگاه صالح و قانون حاکم در دعاوی مذکور، مقرراتی را تصویب ‌کرده‌اند. همچنین، کنوانسیون‌های مربوط، به‌منظور شناسایی و اجرای احکام صادره در این زمینه در کشوری غیر از کشور صادرکننده نیز مقرراتی دارند که کشورهای عضو را موظف کرده‌اند که احکام صادره در دادگاه صالح کشور خارجی را اجرا کنند و دعوا در آن کشور دوباره مطرح نشود. در این نوشتار، با بررسی کنوانسیون‌های مربوط به خسارت‌های ناشی از فعالیت‌های صلح‌آمیز هسته‌ای، مسائل مذکور را بررسی خواهیم کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

RESOLVING CONFLICTS INVESTIGATING CLAIMS ABOUT DAMAGE CAUSED BY NUCLEAR INCIDENTS

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamid Alhooei Nazari 1
  • Seyyed Mehrdad Amirshahkarami 2
1 Assistant Professor of Public Law Department, University of Tehran
2 Postgraduate of Private Law, Tehran University
چکیده [English]

Due to the fact that nuclear activities sometimes bring about damages beyond the installation state, plaintiffs concerning nuclear damages transgresses international borders. Thus victims often belong to a different nation than the responsible authority. Various conventions have been set to regulate the rules in this regard; therefore, numerous rules have been established to specify the competent court and dominant law for governing the related issues. So, related conventions have set various rules to identify and execute verdicts. In this regard, in a country other than the issuing country, members are necessitated to execute the competent court of the foreign country not to leave any room for posing another claim in the other country. The present paper aims to investigate the related conventions concerning nuclear damages in order to shed light on the related issues.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • compensation
  • Conflict of Rules
  • Convention
  • Nuclear Damages
  • The Competent Court
  • The Court on Installation State
  • Vienna Paris Convention
الف) فارسی
الماسی، نجادعلی (1369).«شناسایی و اجرای احکام مدنی خارجی»،تهران، مجلۀ دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران،شمارۀ 25.
جنیدی، لعیا (1371).اجرای داوری بازرگانی خارجی، تهران: شهر دانش.
یوسف‌پور، بابک و رحیمی، عبدالرحیم (1381). «انرژی هسته‌ای، ضرورت‌ها و سیاست‌ها»، مجلۀ اقتصاد انرژی، شمارۀ 39.
ب) انگلیسی
Acad & eacutemie de Droit International de la Haye (1987). "Recueil Des Cours", Collected Courses, Vol 117, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Adisianya, Anthony (2010). "Different compensation systems under nuclear liability conventions", Return to The Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy Gateway homepage: CAR (CEPMLP Annual Review): CAR Vol 14, No 3.
Gioia, Andrea (1999). "Maritime Zones and The New Provisions on Jurisdiction in the 1997 Vienna", Protocol and in the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation, Nuclear Law Bulletin, no 63.
Chari, P.R. (ed.) (2009). Indo-US Nuclear Deal: Seeking Synergy in Bilateralism, New Delhi: Routledge.
OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (1998). "Expose des motifs, Revised text of the Exposé des Motifs of the Paris Convention", the OECD Council .
Duncan E. J. Currie (2008). "The Problems and gaps in the nuclear liability convention and an analysis of how an actual claim would be brought under the current exiting treaty regime in the event of a nuclear accident", Denv. J. Int’l l. & Pol’y, vol 35, No 1.
dussart Desart, Roland (2006). "The Reform of paris convention on third party liability in the field of nuclear Energy and of the Brussels Supplementary Convention", international nuclear law in the post–chernolbyl period, OECD.
Handrlica, Jakub (2011). "channeling of nuclear third party liability towards the operator jeopardized by the brussels regulations", Vol. 2, Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International law.
Hannes Descamps, Hubert Bocken & Robin Slabbinck (2008). International Documents on Environmental Liability, London: Dordrecht.
INLEX (International Expert Group on Nuclear Liability), (2013). "civil Liability for nuclear Damage, advantages and disadvantages of Joining the International Nuclear Liability Regime", New york: IAEA.
INLEX (2004). "the 1997 vienna convention on civil liability for Nuclear Damage and 1997 convention on supplementary compensation for Nuclear Damage", Explantory Texts, IAEA Publishing.
Kayser, V (2006). Launching Space Objects: Issues of Liability and Future Prospects, Springer Science & Business Media Publishing.
Lamm, vanda (1998). "the protocol Amending the 1963 Vienna convention", Nuclear Law Bulletin, OECD, no.61.
Max Planck, Edit By: Frowein, Jochen A and Wolfrum, Rudiger (1998). Yearbook of United Nation Law, Second Edition: scholary Publishing.
Merlin v. British Nuclear Fuels, PLC (1990). No 3 All ER 711, 720 – 21, [1990] 3 WLR 383.
McRea, B (1999). Reform Of Civil Nuclear Law, session 11, Publishing OCED/NEA.
OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (2007). Liability and compensation for nuclear damage, Michigan: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.
Perritano, Judith (1987). "International Liability for Nuclear Pollution", Suffolk Transnational Law Journal. No 11.
Peter H. Sand (1992). The Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements: A Survey of Existing Legal Instruments, london: Cambridge University Press.
Ralf, Michaels (2009). "Recogntion and  inforcement of foreign Judgments", Max Plank Encyclopedia, public international Law.
sands, philippe, Galizzi, paolo (1999). the 1968 Brusslels convention and liability for nuclear damage, in reform of civil nuclear liability, OECD publishing.
sands, philippe (2003). Principles of International Environmental Law, London: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, Julia A (2006). International Nuclear Third Liability Law: the Response to Chernobyl, published with the International Atomic Energy Agency party, (IEAE).
Yoshifumi, Tanaka (2015). the international Law of Sea, second edition, London: Cambridge University Press.
Tromans, Stephen (2010). Nuclear Law: The Law Applying to Nuclear Installations and Radioactive Substances in its Historic Context, New York :Bloomsbury Publishing.
Xue, Hanqin (2009). Transboundary Damage in International: Law, London: Cambridge University.
پ) قوانین، کنوانسیون‌ها و پروتکل‌ها
Nuclear Installations Act 1965, England.
 
ج) آرای دادگاه
The House of Lords in Spiliada Maritime Corporation v. Cansulex Ltd. [1987], 1 A.C.460  Available at: http://www.gutenberg.us/articles/spiliada_maritime_corp._v._cansulex_ltd. 16/12/2015
Andrew Owusu v. Nugent B. Jackson (2005). Case C-281/02 Available At: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/LKD/?uri=CELEX:62002CJ0281 10/11/2015
Merlin v. British Nuclear Fuels, PLC, [1990] 3 All ER 711, 720 – 21,3 WLR 383.