موافقت‌نامه‌های انتخاب دادگاه در دعاوی مالکیت فکری؛ بررسی کنوانسیون لاهه 2005

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

در سه دهۀ اخیر تحولات در عرصۀ تکنولوژی و ارتباطات، به‌ویژه اینترنت، و تمایل کشورها به هماهنگی در حمایت از حقوق مالکیت فکری در سطح بین‌المللی، ابعاد خاصی را در صلاحیت بین‌المللی دادگاه‌ها در رسیدگی به دعاوی مالکیت فکری و شناسایی و اجرای آرای صادره مطرح کرده است. مهم‌ترین سند بین‌المللی که تا به امروز به جنبه‌های حقوق بین‌الملل خصوصیِ حقوق مالکیت فکری پرداخته، کنوانسیون لاهه 2005 دربارۀ موافقت‌نامه‌های انتخاب دادگاه است. باوجود اهمیت موضوع در عرصۀ بین‌الملل، خلأ قانونی در ایران از حیث قواعد صلاحیت و شناسایی و اجرا در دعاوی مالکیت فکری مشهود است. در این مقاله کوشش شده است تا با بررسی سابقۀ تدوین کنوانسیون و تحلیل مواد مربوط به صلاحیت و شناسایی و اجرا در دعاوی مالکیت فکری، ضمن معرفی کنوانسیون و تأکید بر جنبه‌های مثبت آن، به دستاوردهایی که ممکن است عضویت ایران در کنوانسیون به همراه داشته باشد، اشاره شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Choice of court agreement in intellectual property disputes (A Review of the Hague Convention 2005)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed Habiba 1
  • Farzaneh Shakeri 2
1 Associate Professor, Islamic and Private Law Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 PhD Student in Private Law at Faculty of Law and Political Sciences of University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Development of technology and communications, especially emergence of the internet as well as states’ inclination to achieve a harmonized protection of intellectual property rights in international level in the last three decades, have brought a new perspectives on international jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in the field of intellectual property rights. The most important international document covering relation between private international law and intellectual property law is Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005. Despite the significance of the topic in international arena, the Iranian legislation lacks jurisdictional provisions with respect to intellectual property disputes. This article attempts to highlight positive consequences of Iran’s membership in the Convention, discussing the drafting history of the Convention and analyzing its provisions regarding jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement in intellectual property disputes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • copy rights
  • infringement
  • Jurisdiction
  • Recognition and enforcement
  • related rights
  • validity
  1. الف) فارسی:

    1. شمس، عبدالله، آیین دادرسی مدنی،چاپ هفتم، بهار 1384،انتشارات دراک،جلد نخست. 

    2. مافی،همایون؛ محمدی، سام؛ و کاویار، حسین، "دادگاه صالح برای رسیدگی به دعاوی ناشی از قراردادهای الکترونیکی"، مجلۀ حقوقی دادگستری،سال 75، ش 74، 1390، ص 190-161.

     

    ب) خارجی:

    1. Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Recognition of Judgments in Intellectual Property Matters, 5 February 2005, available at http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=12386, accessed at 18/12/2015
    2. Draft on exclusive choice of court agreements (Work. Doc. No 110, revised April 2004, 2004, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=publications.details&pid=3511&dtid=35
    3. Dreyfuss (2001) “An Alert to the Intellectual Property Bar: The Hague Judgments Convention”, University of Illinois Law review, No1.  
    4. Dreyfuss Rochelle C. & Ginsburg Jane C. (2002) “Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Recognition of Judgments in Intellectual Property Matters”, Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 77, pp.100-183
    5. ECJ Case C-4/03 Gesellschaftfür Antriebstechnikmb H& Co. KG (GAT) v Lamellen und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs KG.(LuK) [2006] ECJ I-6509
    6. European Max Planck Group on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property (2013) Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property, The CLIP Principles and Commentary, London: Oxford
    7. Final Act of the Eighteenth Session, Part B, No 1, Hague Conference on Private International Law, Proceedings of the Eighteenth Session, Tome I, 1999, p.47.
    8. Fumagalli, Luigi (2010) “Litigating Intellectual property Rights Disputes Cross-Border: Jurisdiction and recognition of Judgments under the Brussels I Regulation”, Bariatti, Stefania (eds) “Litigating Intellectual property Rights Disputes Cross-Border: EU Regulations, ALI Principles, CLIP Project”, Milan: CEDAM, pp.15-38.
    9. Informational note on the work of the informal meetings held since October 1999 to consider and develop drafts on outstanding items, Informational note on the work of the informal meetings held since October 1999 to consider and develop drafts on outstanding items, 2001, available at http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=publications.details&pid=3498&dtid=35

    10.Interim Text – Summary of the Outcome of the Discussion in Commission II of the First Part of the Diplomatic Conference (6-22 June 2001), prepared by the Permanent Bureau and the Co-reporters, 2001, available at http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=publications.details&pid=3499&dtid=35

    11.Kono T (2012) Intellectual Property and Private International Law, Oxford and Portland: Oregon, Hart Publishing

    12.Nygh & Pocar, Report on the Preliminary Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters adopted by the Special Commission, Hague Conference, Prel. Doc. No.11, available at http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=publications.details&pid=3494&dtid=35

    13.Pfund, (1994) “Contributing to Progressive Development of Private International law: The International Process and the United States Approach”, Recueil des Cours, Vol. 249, pp.13-83)

    14.Prel. Doc. No 20 of November 2002 – Report on the first meeting of the Informal Working Group on the Judgments Project of October 2002, 2002, available at http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=publications.details&pid=3504&dtid=35

    15.Prel. Doc. No 21 of January 2003 - Report on the Second Meeting of the Informal Working Group on the Judgments Project of January 2003, 2003, available at http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=publications.details&pid=3505&dtid=35

    16.Prel. Doc. No 22 of June 2003 – Report on the work of the Informal Working Group on the Judgments Project, in particular on the preliminary text achieved at its third meeting of March 2003, 2003, available at http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=publications.details&pid=3507&dtid=35

    17.Prel. Doc. No 25 of March 2004 - Explanatory Report on the Preliminary Draft Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, drawn up by Trevor C. Hartley and Masato Dogauchi, 2004, available at http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=publications.details&pid=3510&dtid=35

    18.Report of the experts meeting on the intellectual property aspects of the future Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Geneva, February 2001, available at http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=publications.details&pid=3496&dtid=35

    19.Schulz Adrea (2005) “The Hague Conference Project for a Global Convention on Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement in Civil and Commercial Matters: An Update”, Intellectual property and Private International Law, Heading for the Future, Oxford: Hart Publishing

    20.Schulz Andrea (2005) “The Hague Projects of a Global Judgments Convention on IP Rights: Recent Developments”, Intellectual Property in the Conflict of Laws, Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, Vol. 44, pp 39-56

    21.UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce with Guide to Enactment 1996, with additional article 5 bis as adopted in 1998, available at http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/electronic_commerce/1996Model.html

    22.United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna, 1980) (CISG), available at http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/sale_goods/1980CISG.html